Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 3536/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine validity of contract under Civil Code provisions.

Case Number I CSK 3536/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The core dispute involves the plaintiff's claim for contract invalidity against the defendant bank, with arguments centered on specific contractual defects. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than ruling on the merits immediately.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to review the application of substantive law regarding contract validity if the lower court's decision lacks a binding precedent or contains a significant error in legal application.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance contract validity dispute Civil Code provisions bank contract dispute legal error review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 3536/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 25 listopada 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Władysław Pawlak w sprawie z powództwa B. M. ‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o stwierdzenie nieważności umowy,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 25 listopada 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Szczecinie‎z dnia 26 stycznia 2022 r., sygn. akt I ACa 650/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.