Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 3485/23 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal against bank contract non-bindingness ruling due to lack of new evidence.

Case Number I CSK 3485/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment declaring the bank contract non-binding. The plaintiff argued that the contract lacked mutual intent, but the court found no new facts or evidence to overturn the lower court's findings. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the cassation procedure requires demonstrating a violation of law based on new circumstances, which was not established.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 2 pkt 1 k.p.c.: The cassation court dismisses an appeal if the lower court's judgment is based on established facts and the appellant fails to present new evidence or prove a violation of law.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal contract non-bindingness lack of new evidence mutual intent bank contract dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 2 pkt 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 52/23
Court allows partial claim on damages and interest by adjusting start date and recalculating litigation costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 3485/23 POSTANOWIENIE 16 maja 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Karol Weitz na posiedzeniu niejawnym 16 maja 2025 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa P. K.-K.‎przeciwko Bank […]. spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o zapłatę i ustalenie braku związania powódki na przyszłość postanowieniami umowy, ewentualnie o zapłatę i ustalenie nieistnienia stosunku prawnego,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej P. K.-K.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie‎z 24 kwietnia 2023 r., I ACa 52/23, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.[a.ł]