Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 3446/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank's debt claim against individuals is valid.

Case Number I CSK 3446/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by J.J. and B.N. against the Wrocław Court of Appeal's judgment. The plaintiffs argued that the bank's claim for payment and determination of debt lacked sufficient legal basis. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to resolve the substantive dispute regarding the validity of the debt.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to determine whether the lower court's decision requires further examination to resolve the substantive legal dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance bank debt claim payment determination civil procedure code substantive dispute resolution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 3446/22 POSTANOWIENIE 30 czerwca 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Roman Trzaskowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 30 czerwca 2023 r. w Warszawie,‎w sprawie z powództwa J.J. i B.N.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o zapłatę i ustalenie,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej J.J. i B.N.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we Wrocławiu‎z 10 stycznia 2022 r., I ACa 882/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. (K.L.)[ł.n]