Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 34/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank's refusal to pay constitutes unjust enrichment.

Case Number I CSK 34/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the bank against the appellate court's judgment. The case involves a dispute where the plaintiffs claim unjust enrichment due to the bank's refusal to transfer funds, while the bank argues the transfer was legally justified. The court decided to remand the case for further examination to clarify the specific circumstances of the alleged enrichment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych; ustawa o księgach rachunkowych: The court must determine whether a refusal to perform a payment obligation constitutes unjust enrichment when the underlying legal basis for the obligation is contested.

Keywords

AI generated
unjust enrichment banking dispute cassation appeal payment obligation civil procedure

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 34/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 15 kwietnia 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Grzegorz Misiurek w sprawie z powództwa S. K., J. K., J. S. i X. S.‎przeciwko Bank […] spółce akcyjnej w G.‎o ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 15 kwietnia 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 6 lipca 2020 r., sygn. akt V ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.