Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 338/23 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine bank liability for unauthorized account access and damages.

Case Number I CSK 338/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by plaintiffs P. W. and M. W. against the Wrocław Court of Appeal's judgment. The plaintiffs argued that the bank failed to prevent unauthorized access to their accounts and sought compensation for damages. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine the bank's specific liability and the extent of the damages claimed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to determine the facts of the case when the lower court's judgment contains errors in establishing the facts necessary for the resolution of the dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance bank liability unauthorized account access civil liability damages factual errors review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 548/22
od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we Wrocławiu‎z 30 września 2022 r., I ACa 548/22, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.[SOP] [ał]

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 338/23 POSTANOWIENIE 20 kwietnia 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Marcin Łochowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 20 kwietnia 2023 r. w W.,‎w sprawie z powództwa P. W. i M. W.‎przeciwko Bank w W.‎o ustalenie i zapłatę,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej P. W. i M. W. od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we Wrocławiu‎z 30 września 2022 r., I ACa 548/22, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.[SOP] [ał]