Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 3373/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether enforcement title against bank is voidable due to procedural defects.

Case Number I CSK 3373/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff sought to have the enforcement title against the bank declared voidable due to alleged procedural irregularities. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than ruling on the merits immediately.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to determine whether the lower court's decision violates the law or if the enforcement title is voidable, requiring further review of the specific procedural defects alleged.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance enforcement title voidability procedural defects review bank liability enforcement civil procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 3373/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 15 września 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Wesołowski w sprawie z powództwa B. M.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o pozbawienie tytułu wykonawczego wykonalności,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 15 września 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powódki ‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we Wrocławiu‎z dnia 11 stycznia 2022 r., sygn. akt I ACa 391/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.