Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 3364/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank's refusal to pay constitutes unjust enrichment.

Case Number I CSK 3364/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant bank against the appellate court's judgment. The core dispute involves whether the plaintiff's claim for payment constitutes unjust enrichment given the bank's specific refusal to disburse funds. The court decided to remand the case for further examination to clarify the factual basis for the alleged unjust enrichment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 405 k.c.; Art. 410 k.c.: The court accepts a cassation appeal when the lower court's decision requires clarification of facts to determine if a claim for payment constitutes unjust enrichment under civil law.

Keywords

AI generated
unjust enrichment cassation appeal civil law payment refusal bank liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 405 k.c.
Art. 410 k.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
V ACa 328/21
akt V ACa 328/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 3364/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 17 marca 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Grzegorz Misiurek w sprawie z powództwa A. C. i B. C.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o ustalenie i zapłatę ewentualnie o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym 17 marca 2023 r. w Izbie Cywilnej w Warszawie,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie‎z 2 grudnia 2021 r., sygn. akt V ACa 328/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.