Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 3350/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine invalidity of contract between individuals and bank.

Case Number I CSK 3350/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the defendant's cassation appeal to determine the invalidity of a contract between the plaintiffs and the bank. The lower court had previously ruled on the potential invalidity or ineffectiveness of the agreement following an appeal from the Białystok Court of Appeal. By admitting the appeal, the court signals that the legal issues regarding the contract's validity warrant further examination at the final instance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may admit a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to examine the validity of the contract or the grounds for its invalidity.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal admissibility contract invalidity determination ineffectiveness of agreement bank contract dispute final instance review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 3350/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 13 stycznia 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Karol Weitz w sprawie z powództwa R. S. i A. S.‎przeciwko Bankowi spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o ustalenie nieważności umowy ewentualnie bezskuteczności,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym 13 stycznia 2023 r. w Izbie Cywilnej w Warszawie,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Białymstoku‎z 22 grudnia 2021 r., sygn. akt I ACa 838/20, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania