Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 3333/23 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal against enforcement title revocation due to lack of new evidence.

Case Number I CSK 3333/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the cassation appeal filed by H. D. and R. D. against the appellate court's decision to revoke the enforceability of a title. The plaintiffs argued that the original enforcement title was invalid, but the court found no new evidence to support their claims. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed because the lower court's decision remained legally sound and unchallenged by sufficient proof.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.k.: A cassation appeal is inadmissible if the appellant fails to present new evidence or arguments that could have changed the outcome of the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal enforcement title revocation new evidence requirement civil procedure law dismissal of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 3333/23 POSTANOWIENIE 30 grudnia 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Maciej Kowalski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 30 grudnia 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa H. D. i R. D.‎przeciwko T. spółce z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością w P.‎o pozbawienie wykonalności tytułu wykonawczego,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej H. D. i R. D.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Krakowie‎z 9 marca 2023 r., I AGa 248/21, odmawia przyjęcia skargi kasacyjnej do rozpoznania. (a.z.)[a.ł]