Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 333/18 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law regarding the claim for payment.

Case Number I CSK 333/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the district court's judgment. The plaintiff sought payment from the defendant company, while the defendant argued against the lower court's ruling. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to review whether the lower court committed a procedural error or misapplied the law in the judgment.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal payment claim procedural error misapplication of law Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 333/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 29 czerwca 2018 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Paweł Grzegorczyk w sprawie z powództwa P.K.‎przeciwko ,,H” sp. z o.o. sp.k. w R.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 29 czerwca 2018 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej ‎od wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w W.‎z dnia 31 sierpnia 2017 r., sygn. akt XXIII Ga […]/17, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.