Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 332/25 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal against civil compensation and pension award for wrongful detention. The court rejects the claim based on procedural defects and lack of new evidence. The decision upholds the lower court's ruling on damages and rent. The court emphasizes strict adherence to procedural requirements for cassation appeals. The judgment clarifies the standard for reviewing civil compensation claims in detention cases. The ruling affirms the finality of the first-instance judgment on damages. The court notes the appellant failed to meet the burden of proof. The decision reinforces the principle of legal certainty in civil proceedings. The judgment concludes that the cassation appeal is inadmissible due to formal errors.

Case Number I CSK 332/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by S.S. against the Second Instance Court's judgment awarding civil compensation and rent. The appellant argued that the lower court erred in assessing damages and failed to consider new evidence regarding the duration of detention. The court rejected these arguments, finding no substantial grounds to overturn the first-instance judgment and noting procedural deficiencies in the appeal. Consequently, the cassation appeal was not accepted for review, and the appellant was not charged with the costs of the cassation proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The cassation appeal is inadmissible if the appellant fails to demonstrate a violation of the law affecting the outcome of the case or if the appeal is based on formal defects that do not justify a retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal inadmissibility civil compensation for detention Supreme Court review standards procedural defects in appeal burden of proof cassation legal certainty principle costs of cassation proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
V ACa 1383/22
w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa S.S.‎przeciwko Skarbowi Państwa - Dyrektorowi Aresztu Śledczego w W.‎o zadośćuczynienie i rentę,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej S.S.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie ‎z 7 maja 2024 r., V ACa 1383/22, 1.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 332/25 POSTANOWIENIE 17 grudnia 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Grzesiowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 17 grudnia 2025 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa S.S.‎przeciwko Skarbowi Państwa - Dyrektorowi Aresztu Śledczego w W.‎o zadośćuczynienie i rentę,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej S.S.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie ‎z 7 maja 2024 r., V ACa 1383/22, 1. odmawia przyjęcia skargi kasacyjnej do rozpoznania, 2. nie obciąża powoda kosztami postępowania kasacyjnego. (G.N.-J.)[SOP]