Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 3317/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal regarding judge recusal due to prior involvement in related proceedings.

Case Number I CSK 3317/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by A.G.1 against the recusal of Judge X.Y. The appellant argued that the judge should be excluded from the case due to prior participation in related proceedings involving the same parties. The court rejected this claim, finding no legal basis for recusal under the Civil Procedure Code given the specific circumstances of the judge's previous involvement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 381 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 382 § 1 k.p.c.: A judge is not required to recuse themselves from a case solely because they previously participated in related proceedings involving the same parties, provided no direct conflict of interest or bias is established.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial recusal cassation appeal related proceedings conflict of interest Civil Procedure Code judge impartiality party identity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 381 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 382 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 3317/22 POSTANOWIENIE 21 czerwca 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Beata Janiszewska na posiedzeniu niejawnym 21 czerwca 2023 r. w Warszawie,‎w sprawie z wniosku A.G.‎z udziałem D.G., U.G., A.G.1 jako następców prawnych W.G., E.G., J.G., D.G.1, J.P., D.P., I.F., K.P., J.P. i J.G.1‎o zasiedzenie,‎na skutek żądania sędziego Sądu Najwyższego X.Y.‎wyłączenia od rozpoznania skargi kasacyjnej A.G.1 ‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Krakowie‎z 17 kwietnia 2018 r., II Ca 4/18, wyłącza SSN X.Y. od rozpoznania niniejszej sprawy. [MS]