Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 33/14 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to review contract invalidity claim based on specific legal grounds.

Case Number I CSK 33/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff sought to have a contract declared void, while the defendant argued against the alleged invalidity. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than ruling on the merits immediately.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's judgment violates the law or if the appeal raises a question of law requiring clarification.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance contract invalidity civil procedure law Supreme Court jurisdiction legal error review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 33/14 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 24 września 2014 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marta Romańska w sprawie z powództwa B. P.‎przeciwko M. K.‎o uznanie umowy za bezskuteczną,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 24 września 2014 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powódki ‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 8 sierpnia 2013 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.