Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 3250/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank's refusal to pay damages is justified.

Case Number I CSK 3250/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant bank against the appellate court's judgment. The case involves a dispute where the plaintiffs sought damages from the bank, which refused payment based on specific contractual or legal grounds. The court decided to refer the matter for further examination to clarify the justification for the bank's refusal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to determine whether the lower court's decision was based on a violation of substantive law or a misinterpretation of the facts.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance bank liability dispute damages refusal substantive law violation civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 636/21
Court corrects bank judgment wording from 'jointly' to 'together' and dismisses appeal on merits.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 3250/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 16 grudnia 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Piotrowska w sprawie z powództwa A. D. i B. D.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o ustalenie i zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 16 grudnia 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Szczecinie‎z dnia 14 grudnia 2021 r., sygn. akt I ACa 636/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE