Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 3247/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank's refusal to pay constitutes unjust enrichment.

Case Number I CSK 3247/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant bank against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff sought a declaration of unjust enrichment and payment, arguing the bank retained funds without legal basis, while the bank contended the transfer was valid. The court decided to remand the case for further examination to clarify the specific circumstances of the fund retention.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 405 k.c.; Art. 410 k.c.: The court established that a cassation appeal regarding unjust enrichment claims is admissible when the lower court failed to examine the essential conditions for the claim's validity.

Keywords

AI generated
unjust enrichment cassation appeal civil procedure bank transfer payment obligation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 405 k.c.
Art. 410 k.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 3247/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 17 października 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Piotrowska w sprawie z powództwa Z. D. i H. D.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o ustalenie i zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 17 października 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Szczecinie‎z dnia 16 grudnia 2021 r., sygn. akt I ACa 563/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE