Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 316/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank's refusal to pay constitutes unjust enrichment.

Case Number I CSK 316/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the bank against the appellate court's judgment. The dispute centers on whether the plaintiff's claim for unjust enrichment is valid given the bank's specific refusal to pay. The court decided to remand the case for further examination to clarify the factual basis of the alleged unjust enrichment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to examine a crucial issue of law or fact necessary for the resolution of the dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance unjust enrichment claim bank payment refusal civil procedure remand supreme court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 316/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 7 lutego 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marian Kocon w sprawie z powództwa W. S.‎przeciwko […] Bank spółce akcyjnej z siedzibą w W.‎o ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 7 lutego 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 22 października 2020 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.