Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 309/14 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation against lower court's dismissal of adverse possession claim due to procedural error.

Case Number I CSK 309/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation complaints filed by two participants against the district court's decision dismissing the adverse possession claim. The lower court had rejected the request to establish ownership through prescription, but the Supreme Court identified a procedural flaw in the district court's reasoning regarding the calculation of the required possession period. Consequently, the case was remanded for further examination to correct the procedural error and properly assess the facts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego; Art. 147 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego: The Supreme Court may accept cassation complaints when the lower court's decision violates statutory provisions on the calculation of the prescription period or fails to address essential procedural requirements for establishing ownership through adverse possession.

Keywords

AI generated
adverse possession prescription period cassation procedure ownership acquisition procedural error civil law Supreme Court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 147 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 309/14 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 8 stycznia 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Anna Owczarek w sprawie z wniosku T. M.‎przy uczestnictwie E. L., A. B., D. M., E. B., J. M., M. M. i Miasta W.‎o stwierdzenie nabycia własności nieruchomości przez zasiedzenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 8 stycznia 2015 r.,‎na skutek skarg kasacyjnych uczestniczek D. M. i E. B.‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w W.‎z dnia 5 grudnia 2013 r., sygn. akt V Ca […], przyjmuje skargi kasacyjne do rozpoznania.