Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 2840/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank's refusal to pay constitutes unjust enrichment.

Case Number I CSK 2840/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant bank against the district court's judgment. The plaintiff sought a declaration that the bank's refusal to pay constituted unjust enrichment, while the bank argued the debt was valid. The court decided to proceed with the case to examine the substantive legal issues regarding the nature of the debt.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych; ustawa o księgowości: When a creditor refuses to perform a contractual obligation without legal basis, the debtor may claim unjust enrichment, but the court must first verify the existence of a valid debt relationship.

Keywords

AI generated
unjust enrichment cassation appeal bank refusal contractual obligation Supreme Court civil procedure debt verification

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 2840/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 22 listopada 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Karol Weitz w sprawie z powództwa A. K.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 22 listopada 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w Olsztynie‎z dnia 30 listopada 2021 r., sygn. akt IX Ca 1179/21, 1. przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania