Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 274/23 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal on damages claim, upholding lower court's award against defendants.

Case Number I CSK 274/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the defendants against the appellate court's judgment awarding damages to the plaintiff. The plaintiff sought compensation for non-pecuniary harm and rent, arguing the defendants' actions caused significant distress, while the defendants contended the claimed amounts were excessive. The court rejected the appeal, affirming the lower court's decision to order the defendants to pay the awarded sum and their associated costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 465 § 1 k.c.: A cassation appeal is inadmissible if it fails to meet the statutory requirements for admissibility or if the judgment under review is final and binding.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal dismissal non-pecuniary damages joint and several liability costs of proceedings final judgment enforcement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 465 § 1 k.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 274/23 POSTANOWIENIE 7 lutego 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Marcin Krajewski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 7 lutego 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa W.C.‎przeciwko J.B., J.B.1 i A.B.‎z udziałem interwenienta ubocznego U. spółki akcyjnej w W.‎o zapłatę zadośćuczynienia i rentę,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej J.B., J.B.1 i A.B.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Białymstoku‎z 30 września 2022 r., I ACa 762/22, 1. odmawia przyjęcia skargi kasacyjnej do rozpoznania, 2. zasądza solidarnie od J.B., J.B.1 i A.B. na rzecz W.C. 2717 złotych zwrotu kosztów postępowania kasacyjnego. (E.M.) UZASADNIENIE