Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 24/17 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal against administrative compensation claim dismissal regarding property expropriation dispute.

Case Number I CSK 24/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's dismissal of the plaintiff's claim for compensation. The dispute concerns a compensation request submitted by individuals A. B. and M.C. against the State Treasury, specifically the Minister of Economy, following an administrative decision. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright, indicating a need to review the legal grounds for the lower court's ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's decision violates the law or fails to apply the law correctly, necessitating a review of the legal reasoning rather than a final judgment on the merits.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance administrative compensation claim State Treasury liability property expropriation dispute legal error review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 24/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 22 czerwca 2017 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Józef Frąckowiak w sprawie z powództwa A. B. i M.C.‎przeciwko Skarbowi Państwa - Ministrowi Gospodarki‎o odszkodowanie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 22 czerwca 2017 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej ‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 8 września 2016 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.