Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 2240/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine bank liability for unauthorized account access.

Case Number I CSK 2240/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant bank against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiffs sought to establish the bank's liability for unauthorized access to their accounts, while the bank argued against the findings of fact. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine the specific circumstances of the alleged breach.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's decision requires clarification of facts or application of law to determine the extent of the bank's liability.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance bank liability unauthorized account access civil procedure code fact clarification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 2240/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 29 listopada 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Dariusz Zawistowski w sprawie z powództwa D. M., D. P. i M. M.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 29 listopada 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Białymstoku‎z dnia 6 października 2021 r., sygn. akt I ACa 61/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.