Supreme Court allows cassation to determine bank liability for damages caused by unauthorized account access.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by three plaintiffs against a lower court judgment. The plaintiffs alleged unauthorized access to their bank accounts, while the bank contended the transactions were legitimate or the plaintiffs failed to prove negligence. The court decided to remand the case for further proceedings to establish the specific facts regarding the breach of security and the extent of the damages.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to ascertain the facts necessary for the proper application of the law, thereby necessitating a remand for fact-finding.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedFull text
I CSK 2235/24 POSTANOWIENIE 29 maja 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Piotr Telusiewicz na posiedzeniu niejawnym 29 maja 2025 r. w Warszawiew sprawie z powództwa G. R., J. R. i J. R.przeciwko Bankowi […] w […]o ustalenie i zapłatę,na skutek skargi kasacyjnej G. R., J. R. i J. R.od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawiez 11 grudnia 2023 r., I ACa 1167/22, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.[a.ł]