Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 2229/23 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to establish necessary path due to conflicting lower court rulings.

Case Number I CSK 2229/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by R. K. against the Regional Court's refusal to establish a necessary path. The lower courts issued conflicting decisions regarding the legal requirements for such a designation, creating uncertainty for the parties involved. Consequently, the Court remanded the case for further proceedings to resolve the procedural inconsistency.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 2 k.p.c.: When lower courts issue contradictory rulings on the same legal issue, the Supreme Court may accept the cassation appeal to ensure uniform application of law and resolve the conflict.

Keywords

AI generated
necessary path establishment conflicting lower court rulings cassation appeal acceptance procedural uniformity Supreme Court remand

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 2229/23 POSTANOWIENIE 6 czerwca 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Grzesiowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 6 czerwca 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z wniosku A. F.‎z udziałem R. K., I. D., S. D., P. K., M. K. i Gminy Miasto Dębica‎o ustanowienie drogi koniecznej,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej R. k.‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Rzeszowie‎z 3 listopada 2022 r., V Ca 404/22, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. [SOP] [ms]