Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 2204/22 AI generated

Plaintiff's appeal to publish a correction is dismissed because the defendant's right to reply was already granted.

Case Number I CSK 2204/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding the publication of a correction. The plaintiff argued that the defendant failed to publish a correction despite a prior request, while the defendant contended that their right to reply had already been exercised. The court ruled that since the defendant had already published a correction, the plaintiff's claim for a new one was legally unfounded.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 240 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 241 § 1 k.p.c.: The court dismissed the appeal because the defendant had already fulfilled the obligation to publish a correction, rendering the plaintiff's request for a new correction inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
right to reply publication of correction cassation appeal civil procedure code media liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 240 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 241 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
VI ACa 442/21
akt VI ACa 442/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 2204/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 22 września 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Karol Weitz w sprawie z powództwa T. spółki akcyjnej w W.‎przeciwko Redaktorowi Naczelnemu portalu […]‎o opublikowanie sprostowania,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 22 września 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie‎z dnia 20 września 2021 r., sygn. akt VI ACa 442/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.