Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 220/25 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine contract termination and payment against bank.

Case Number I CSK 220/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court admitted the cassation appeal filed by M.P. and E.P. against the Wrocław Court of Appeal's judgment. The plaintiffs argued that the bank failed to properly terminate their contract and refused to pay the agreed sum. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to resolve the specific contractual disputes.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court admits a cassation appeal when the lower court's decision violates the law regarding the termination of a contract or the determination of payment obligations.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal admission contract termination dispute payment obligation determination bank contract liability civil procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 1156/23
i E.P.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we Wrocławiu‎z 18 września 2024 r., I ACa 1156/23, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 220/25 POSTANOWIENIE 30 maja 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Kamil Zaradkiewicz na posiedzeniu niejawnym 30 maja 2025 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa M.P. i E.P.‎przeciwko Bankowi S.A. w W.‎o ustalenie i zapłatę,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej M.P. i E.P.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we Wrocławiu‎z 18 września 2024 r., I ACa 1156/23, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. [SOP]