Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 220/24 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine damages for breach of contract and unjust enrichment.

Case Number I CSK 220/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by K. H. and T. H. against the Wrocław Court of Appeal's judgment. The plaintiffs argued for contract damages and unjust enrichment, while the defendant contested the liability and calculation methods. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to resolve the specific monetary claims.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to determine the scope of liability and the amount of damages when the lower court's decision leaves the assessment of civil liability or the calculation of compensation unclear or erroneous.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance breach of contract damages unjust enrichment claim civil liability scope monetary compensation assessment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 2258/22
H.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we Wrocławiu‎z 13 lipca 2023 r., I ACa 2258/22, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 220/24 POSTANOWIENIE 6 listopada 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Grzegorz Misiurek na posiedzeniu niejawnym 6 listopada 2025 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa K. H. i T. H.‎przeciwko […] spółce akcyjnej […]‎o ustalenie i zapłatę,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej K. H. i T. H.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we Wrocławiu‎z 13 lipca 2023 r., I ACa 2258/22, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. (A.T.)[a.ł]