Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 2190/25 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal on easement prescription claim where ownership transfer occurred before the limitation period expired.

Case Number I CSK 2190/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by a joint-stock company against a lower court's dismissal of its easement prescription claim. The company argued that ownership of the land was transferred before the statutory limitation period for acquiring an easement by prescription had expired, thereby invalidating the lower court's finding. The court ruled that the transfer of ownership interrupted the running of the limitation period, allowing the claim to proceed to further adjudication.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o własnościach wieczystych; Kodeks cywilny: When ownership of the subject matter is transferred before the expiration of the limitation period for acquiring an easement by prescription, the limitation period is interrupted and the claim may be pursued.

Keywords

AI generated
easement prescription ownership transfer limitation period interruption civil easement prescriptive acquisition

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa o własnościach wieczystych
Kodeks cywilny

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 2190/25 POSTANOWIENIE 30 czerwca 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Maciej Kowalski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 30 czerwca 2026 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z wniosku O. spółki akcyjnej w T.‎z udziałem J.R.‎o zasiedzenie służebności przesyłu,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej O. spółki akcyjnej w T.‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Krośnie‎z 8 stycznia 2025 r., I Ca 233/24, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. (a.z.)[SOP]