Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 217/24 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine procedural defect in scheduling hearing order.

Case Number I CSK 217/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by Z.T. against the lower court's scheduling order. The appellant argued that the hearing date was set without proper notice and violated procedural rights, while the opposing parties contended the schedule was legally sound. The court decided to admit the appeal for review because the scheduling order contained a potential procedural flaw requiring further examination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's procedural order violates fundamental rights or contains a significant procedural defect requiring review.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance scheduling hearing order procedural defect review notice violation Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 217/24 POSTANOWIENIE 25 lutego 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Marcin Trzebiatowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 25 lutego 2026 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z wniosku Z.T.‎z udziałem I.C., A.K., W.K., A.T., K.T., T.T., R.T. i J.K.‎o zasiedzenie,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej Z.T.‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego Warszawa - Praga w Warszawie‎z 10 maja 2023 r., IV Ca 1417/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. (M.K.)[SOP]