Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to terminate co-ownership due to lack of final lower court ruling.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court admitted the cassation appeal filed by T.P. against the Lower Regional Court's decision to terminate co-ownership. The appellant argued that the first-instance judgment was flawed, while the respondent maintained the property division was correct. The Court ruled that since the first-instance judgment was not final, the appeal must be remanded for further proceedings rather than dismissed outright.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 379 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 380 § 1 k.p.c.: When the first-instance judgment is not final, the cassation appeal is not dismissed but remanded for further proceedings to ensure the right to a final judgment is respected.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
I CSK 2154/25 POSTANOWIENIE 25 lutego 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Dariusz Zawistowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 25 lutego 2026 r. w Warszawiew sprawie z wniosku E.P.z udziałem T.P.o zniesienie współwłasności,na skutek skargi kasacyjnej T.P.od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Gdańskuz 28 czerwca 2024 r., XVI Ca 493/23, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. [a.ł]