Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 209/17 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation to determine ownership via adverse possession after lower court rejected claim.

Case Number I CSK 209/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal to review the lower court's rejection of the adverse possession claim. The applicant argued that continuous possession for the statutory period established ownership, while the opposing party contested the continuity and nature of the possession. The court decided to proceed with the review because the lower court's ruling required further examination of the factual circumstances regarding the duration and exclusivity of the possession.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 118 ust. 1 k.c.; Art. 119 k.c.: The court must examine cassation appeals where the lower court's decision on adverse possession requires further factual clarification regarding the continuity and exclusivity of possession.

Keywords

AI generated
adverse possession ownership acquisition cassation appeal continuous possession Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 118 ust. 1 k.c.
Art. 119 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 209/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 10 lipca 2017 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Grzegorz Misiurek w sprawie z wniosku A. K.‎przy uczestnictwie B. K., J. K., S. K., J. W., X. W., M. W., S. W., Y. W., A. Z., M. K., K. K., X. K. i K. B.‎o stwierdzenie nabycia własności nieruchomości przez zasiedzenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 10 lipca 2017 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawczyni od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w W.‎z dnia 10 grudnia 2015 r., sygn. akt V Ca […], ‎przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.