Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 200/14 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to review ownership acquisition by prescription against city's objection.

Case Number I CSK 200/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the applicant against the District Court's ruling on ownership acquisition by prescription. The city argued against the applicant's claim, but the Supreme Court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than dismissing it outright. This procedural move indicates the court found the lower court's decision insufficiently reasoned or legally flawed regarding the application of prescription rules.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.k.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's decision is based on a violation of the law or is otherwise legally flawed, requiring further review by a collegial panel.

Keywords

AI generated
ownership by prescription cassation appeal acceptance civil procedure law property rights dispute Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 200/14 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 28 listopada 2014 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Iwona Koper w sprawie z wniosku R. W.‎przy uczestnictwie E. B., Miasta W., J. M., M. M., B. P., E. P., M. P., S. P., S. […] Spółki z o.o. w W. i L. W.‎o stwierdzenie nabycia własności nieruchomości przez zasiedzenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 28 listopada 2014 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej uczestnika postępowania - Miasta W. od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w W.‎z dnia 3 października 2013 r., sygn. akt V Ca […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.