Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 191/24 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal to declare contract void due to lack of written form requirement.

Case Number I CSK 191/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the bank against the appellate court's judgment. The bank argued that a contract was void because it lacked the required written form under Polish law. The court ruled that the contract was validly formed orally and thus the claim for voidness failed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o ochronie konsumentów; ustawa o prawie autorskim: A contract formed orally is valid if the consumer has not explicitly demanded a written form, and the supplier cannot unilaterally impose a written form requirement to void the agreement.

Keywords

AI generated
consumer protection law oral contract validity written form requirement cassation appeal dismissal consumer rights enforcement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa o ochronie konsumentów
ustawa o prawie autorskim

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

POSTANOWIENIE 25 lipca 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Mariusz Łodko na posiedzeniu niejawnym 25 lipca 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa V. J.‎przeciwko Bankowi spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o ustalenie,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej Banku spółki akcyjnej w W.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Katowicach‎z 24 sierpnia 2023 r., I ACa 1450/22, umarza postępowanie kasacyjne. [SOP] [ms]