Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 170/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank's refusal to pay constitutes unjust enrichment.

Case Number I CSK 170/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendants against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiffs sought payment from the bank, arguing the bank's refusal to transfer funds constituted unjust enrichment, while the bank contended the funds were lawfully withheld. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine the legal basis for the bank's refusal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 401 k.c.; Art. 405 k.c.: The court establishes that a claim for unjust enrichment may be pursued when a party's refusal to perform a contractual obligation lacks a legal basis, provided the other party can demonstrate the absence of a valid reason for the non-payment.

Keywords

AI generated
unjust enrichment bank refusal cassation appeal contractual obligation legal basis payment dispute civil liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 401 k.c.
Art. 405 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 170/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 29 marca 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Roman Trzaskowski w sprawie z powództwa T. K. i A. K.‎przeciwko […] Bank […] spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o zapłatę ewentualnie o ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 29 marca 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 20 listopada 2020 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.