Supreme Court dismisses appeal in debt collection case where plaintiff failed to prove debt existence.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by I.S. against the appellate court's judgment in a debt collection suit against M.S. The plaintiff argued that a debt existed based on specific transactions, while the defendant contested the validity of the claim. The court ruled that the plaintiff failed to substantiate the alleged debt with sufficient evidence, leading to the rejection of the appeal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.: The cassation appeal is rejected when the lower court's decision is based on a finding of fact that is not supported by the evidence presented in the proceedings.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedFull text
I CSK 127/24 POSTANOWIENIE 8 listopada 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Góra-Błaszczykowska na posiedzeniu niejawnym 8 listopada 2024 r. w Warszawiew sprawie z powództwa I.S.przeciwko M.S.o zapłatę,na skutek skargi kasacyjnej I.Sod wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Białymstokuz 22 maja 2023 r., I ACa 416/23, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania (R.N.)r.g.