Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 1014/23 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses judge's recusal request due to lack of personal interest in the case outcome.

Case Number I CSK 1014/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the judge's request to recuse himself from hearing the cassation appeal filed by the defendant. The plaintiff, M.M. and J.M., sued a bank to establish a debt and obtain payment, while the defendant sought to exclude the judge from the proceedings. The court determined that the judge had no personal interest or bias affecting the impartiality of the decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 227 ust. 1 k.p.k.; Art. 227 ust. 2 k.p.k.: A judge's request for recusal is inadmissible if the judge demonstrates no personal interest or bias that could affect the impartiality of the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial recusal personal interest impartiality requirement cassation appeal judge disqualification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 227 ust. 1 k.p.k.
Art. 227 ust. 2 k.p.k.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 1014/23 POSTANOWIENIE 29 marca 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Monika Koba na posiedzeniu niejawnym 29 marca 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa M.M. i J.M.‎przeciwko Bankowi spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o ustalenie i zapłatę,‎na skutek żądania sędziego Sądu Najwyższego X.Y.wyłączenia od rozpoznania skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Łodzi ‎z 24 października 2022 r., I ACa 23/22, wyłącza sędziego Sądu Najwyższego X.Y. od orzekania w sprawie. [A.T.](r.g.)