Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 101/26 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine payment against bank based on specific contractual dispute facts.

Case Number I CSK 101/26
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by K.K. and A.K. against the Wrocław Court of Appeal's judgment. The plaintiffs sought to establish a debt and payment order against Bank S.A. in W., arguing specific contractual breaches, while the bank contested the claims. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's decision requires clarification of legal issues or if the appeal raises significant questions of law necessitating further review by the appellate instance.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance contractual debt determination bank liability dispute payment order establishment civil procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
V ACa 3109/25
i A.K.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we Wrocławiu‎z 16 września 2025 r., V ACa 3109/25, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjna do rozpoznania.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 101/26 POSTANOWIENIE 27 marca 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Kamil Zaradkiewicz na posiedzeniu niejawnym 27 marca 2026 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa K.K. i A.K.‎przeciwko Bankowi S.A. w W.‎o ustalenie i zapłatę,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej K.K. i A.K.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we Wrocławiu‎z 16 września 2025 r., V ACa 3109/25, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjna do rozpoznania. [M.O.][SOP]