Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 10/17 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to review whether a standard form contract clause is prohibited.

Case Number I CSK 10/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff sought a declaration that a specific clause in a standard form contract was prohibited under consumer protection laws. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine the legality of the contractual term.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 22 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego; Art. 22 ust. 2 Kodeksu cywilnego: A clause in a standard form contract is prohibited if it causes a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations to the detriment of the consumer.

Keywords

AI generated
standard form contract prohibited clause consumer protection significant imbalance cassation appeal civil procedure unfair terms

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 22 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 22 ust. 2 Kodeksu cywilnego

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 10/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 9 czerwca 2017 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marta Romańska w sprawie z powództwa W. K.-K. i S. K.‎przeciwko M. sp. z o.o. w B.‎o uznanie postanowienia wzorca umowy za niedozwolone,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 9 czerwca 2017 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 21 grudnia 2015 r., sygn. akt […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.