Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 1/23 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal against bank's payment claim due to lack of new evidence.

Case Number I CSK 1/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the bank's cassation appeal against the appellate court's judgment ordering payment. The bank argued that new evidence justified a change in the decision, but the court found no such evidence presented. Consequently, the appellate court's ruling upholding the plaintiff's claim was confirmed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.k.: The cassation court rejects an appeal if the appellant fails to demonstrate that the lower court's decision was based on a fact not established in the proceedings or if no new evidence was presented to justify a different outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal lack of new evidence payment claim appellate court ruling bank liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.k.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 1/23 POSTANOWIENIE 17 stycznia 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Dariusz Pawłyszcze na posiedzeniu niejawnym 17 stycznia 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa D. S. i M. S.‎przeciwko Bankowi S.A.‎w W.‎o zapłatę‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej Banku S.A. w W.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Katowicach z 19 sierpnia 2022 r., I ACa 1444/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.[SOP][as]