Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CO 45/20 AI generated

Supreme Court rejects request to recuse judge due to lack of personal interest in the case.

Case Number I CO 45/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the defendant's request to recuse Judge A. O. from the proceedings. The defendant alleged a conflict of interest, but the court found no personal stake or bias in the dispute between P. S.A. and Z. B. Consequently, the judge was deemed impartial and the recusal motion was rejected.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 238 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 238 § 2 k.p.c.: A judge's recusal is not justified if the judge has no personal interest in the outcome of the case.

Keywords

AI generated
recusal of judge personal interest impartiality requirement conflict of interest Supreme Court procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 238 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 238 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CO 45/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 14 maja 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Dariusz Dończyk w sprawie z powództwa P. S.A. ‎w W.‎przeciwko Z. B.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 14 maja 2020 r.,‎na skutek wniosku pozwanego o wyłączenie sędziego Sądu Najwyższego A. O. od orzekania w sprawie o sygn. akt I CO (…), oddala wniosek.