Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CO 18/16 AI generated

Supreme Court determines Warsaw District Court is proper venue for initiating settlement proceedings against US defendant.

Case Number I CO 18/16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ruled that the Warsaw District Court is the competent authority for initiating settlement proceedings against a US-based defendant. The applicant sought to determine the proper venue for serving the American company, arguing for a specific location. The court confirmed Warsaw as the correct jurisdiction based on the defendant's domicile and applicable procedural rules.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 45 k.p.c.; Art. 23 k.p.c.: The court of the defendant's domicile is competent to initiate settlement proceedings, and the applicant must file the request with that specific court.

Keywords

AI generated
competent court settlement proceedings foreign defendant venue determination civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 45 k.p.c.
(USA) do próby ugodowej (art. 45 k.p.c.).
Art. 23 k.p.c.
art. 45 k.p.c
(USA) do próby ugodowej (art. 45 k.p.c.).

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CO 18/16 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 30 maja 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Dariusz Zawistowski w sprawie z wniosku K. […] Spółki jawnej w W.‎o oznaczenie sądu właściwego, przed który wnioskodawca mógłby zawezwać uczestnika A. […] z siedzibą w C. (USA) do zawarcia ugody,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 30 maja 2016 r., oznacza Sąd Rejonowy w W. jako sąd właściwy do złożenia wniosku o zawezwanie A. […] z siedzibą w C. (USA) do próby ugodowej (art. 45 k.p.c.).