Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
IV KK 277/12 AI generated

Criminal appeal dismissed as obviously groundless; defendant convicted of theft and fraud under Polish Criminal Code.

Case Number IV KK 277/12
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by the defendant D. P. as obviously groundless. The defendant was convicted of theft and fraud under Articles 286 and 91 of the Criminal Code, with the appeal challenging the lower court's judgment. The court rejected the appeal because the arguments presented failed to meet the high threshold for cassation review, confirming the original verdict's validity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.k.; Art. 385 § 2 k.k.: A cassation appeal is rejected as obviously groundless when the challenged judgment is based on correct application of law and facts, and the appeal does not raise any new circumstances or errors warranting re-examination.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal obviously groundless theft conviction fraud charges cassation procedure Polish Criminal Code defendant rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.k.
Art. 385 § 2 k.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt IV KK 277/12 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 24 października 2012 r. Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Wiesław Kozielewicz po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej w dniu 24 października 2012 r., sprawy D. P. skazanego z art. 286 § 1 kk w zw. z art. 91 § 1 kk i inne z powodu kasacji wniesionej przez obrońcę skazanego od wyroku Sądu Okręgowego z dnia 18 kwietnia 2012 r., utrzymującego w mocy wyrok Sądu Rejonowego z dnia 9 marca 2011 r., , oddala kasację jako oczywiście bezzasadną, a kosztami sądowymi postępowania kasacyjnego obciąża skazanego D. P. UZASADNIENIE