II UK 160/11
AI generated
Social security appeal dismissed because new facts must exist after the final court decision, not before.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the social security fund's request to reopen a final court judgment granting an employee's pension. The fund argued the court had double-counted contribution periods, but these facts were already known and verified in the prior final ruling. The court held that a reopening request cannot rely on circumstances existing before the final decision if the organ did not appeal that decision.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 114 ust. 2 pkt 2 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach; A request to reopen proceedings based on Art. 114 ust. 2 pkt 2 cannot rely on circumstances existing prior to the final judgment if the administrative organ failed to appeal that judgment.
Keywords
AI generated
social security appeal
reopening proceedings
final judgment
administrative organ
pension rights
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 114 ust. 2 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 3989 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c
art. 403 § 2 k.p.c
art. 39814 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedwyrok Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 13 września 2011 r., I UK 124/11
I UK 124/11
Supreme Court quashes social security court ruling on pension rights due to procedural error in retrial grounds.