Supreme Court rules voter cannot be placed on separate polling list without consent, but must be offered alternative voting option.

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a protest election against the Electoral Code and relevant regulations. The Court found that while the voter was incorrectly registered on a separate hospital polling list without his knowledge, the local electoral commission violated his rights by failing to inform him of the option to vote at his permanent residence. Consequently, the Court ruled that the voter must be offered an alternative voting method rather than being directed to a distant polling station, though the protest did not affect the election results.