III SK 22/11
AI generated
Cassation appeal dismissed as EU law interpretation was clear under acte clair doctrine.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal, refusing to accept the case for review or issue a preliminary ruling. The appellant argued that existing case law created inconsistencies regarding the imposition of fines under the Telecommunications Law. The court determined that the interpretation of the relevant EU directive provisions was so obvious that no reasonable doubt existed, rendering the acte clair doctrine applicable.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 3989 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 267 TFUE: The court may reject a cassation appeal and decline a preliminary ruling if the interpretation of EU law is so clear that no reasonable doubt remains regarding the answer.
Keywords
AI generated
acte clair doctrine
preliminary ruling refusal
cassation appeal dismissal
EU law interpretation
Telecommunications Law
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 3989 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 267 Traktatu o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej
art. 3989 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3989 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 3989 k.p.c
art. 108 § 1 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIII SK 8/10
Supreme Court dismisses fine for prior violation after separate control procedure was already completed.
VI ACa 808/10
III SK 52/10
Supreme Court partially allowed appeal, quashing lower court's change of legal basis for telecom fine.
I UK 87/07
I PK 109/07
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for failure to meet statutory requirements for admissibility under Civil Procedure Code.
III UK 32/07
III UK 50/07
III UK 45/07
III UK 52/08