II K 28/13 AI generated

Court dismisses joint verdict request due to prior final judgments and continuous crime completion dates.

Case Number II K 28/13

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2013-04-04

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the defendant's request to issue a joint verdict combining three separate criminal judgments. The defendant argued for consolidation, but the court found the first judgment predated the continuous crimes constituting the second and third charges. Consequently, the legal prerequisites for a joint verdict under Article 85 of the Criminal Code were absent. The proceedings were terminated, and the state was ordered to reimburse the costs of the defendant's free legal aid.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 85 k.k.; Art. 572 k.p.k.: A joint verdict cannot be issued if one of the constituent judgments is final and the remaining crimes were committed after its entry into force, or if the temporal conditions for continuous crimes do not align with the final judgment's date.

Keywords

AI generated

joint verdict Criminal Code continuous crime procedural dismissal legal aid costs final judgment temporal sequence

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 85 k.k.

Art. 572 k.p.k.

Art. 17§1 pkt. 7 k.p.k.

Art. 339§3 pkt. 1 k.p.k.

Art. 29 ustawy z dnia 26 maja 1982 roku Prawo o adwokaturze

§ 2 ust. 3, § 14 ust. 5 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 28 września 2002 roku

Art. 626§1 k.p.k.

Art. 632 pkt. 2 k.p.k.

art. 245 k.k

art. 572 k.p.k

Court dismisses joint verdict request due to prior final judgments and continuous crime completion dates.

Legislator summary

Legislator headnote

Keywords

Cited Legislation

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Full text