Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UK 32/11 AI generated

Social pension case dismissed; Art. 13 ust. 3 FUS applies to permanent disability via Art. 4 ust. 2 Social Pension Act.

Case Number II UK 32/11
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Magdalena G. against a permanent social pension decision. The applicant argued that Article 13, Section 3 of the Social Security Act only covers temporary disability, yet the lower court granted a permanent pension based on medical findings. The court ruled that Article 13, Section 3 applies to social pensions only where Article 4, Section 2 of the Social Pension Act does not already regulate the matter, and since the latter explicitly allows permanent disability, the former must be interpreted to include it. Consequently, the court found no legal error in granting the permanent pension despite the five-year limitation rule.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 13 ust. 3 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych; Art. 4 ust. 2 ustawy o rencie socjalnej: The provision regarding disability periods exceeding five years applies to social pensions only insofar as it does not conflict with the explicit statutory requirement for permanent disability under the Social Pension Act.

Keywords

AI generated
social pension permanent disability Social Security Act cassation appeal medical assessment legal interpretation disability period

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 13 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
Art. 4 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 27 czerwca 2003 r. o rencie socjalnej
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 39814 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text