Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I UK 63/11 AI generated

Sickness benefit cap remains at prior employment base if no gap exceeds three months between job and self-employment.

Case Number I UK 63/11
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's decision granting a higher sickness benefit to a self-employed woman who had recently been an employee. The applicant argued for a benefit calculated on a higher voluntary contribution base, while the Social Insurance Institution applied the lower mandatory employment base. The court ruled that because the period of sick pay from employment and the subsequent voluntary self-employment sick pay were continuous (with no gap exceeding three months), the benefit amount could not exceed the original employment base. Consequently, the case was remanded for a new ruling on costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 43 ust. 1; Art. 48 ust. 2 ustawy o zasiłkach chorobowych: When a gap between mandatory employee sick pay and voluntary self-employed sick pay is less than three months, the sickness benefit amount cannot exceed the base calculated from the prior employment period.

Keywords

AI generated
sickness benefit cap continuous sick pay period employee to self-employed social insurance base three month gap rule

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 43 ust. 1 ustawy o zasiłkach chorobowych
Art. 48 ust. 2 ustawy o zasiłkach chorobowych
Art. 92 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.
Art. 11 ust. 2 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 6 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 398 § 15 k.p.c.
art. 92 § 1 pkt 1 k.p
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 382 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text