Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 33/11 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; mixed-term contract rules override general dismissal bans during justified absence.

Case Number II PK 33/11
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a lecturer against her university's termination of her employment contract. The court found that the lecturer's position was a mixed-term contract where the employer could terminate upon the expiration of the statutory period for obtaining a doctorate degree. Consequently, the general prohibition on dismissing employees during justified absence did not apply to this specific academic contract type.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 120, 125 Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym; Art. 5 k.p., art. 136 ust. 1 tego Prawa: In mixed-term employment contracts for academic positions, the prohibition on dismissal during justified absence does not apply after the statutory period for obtaining the required degree has expired.

Keywords

AI generated
mixed-term employment contract academic dismissal rules justified absence protection doctorate degree requirement university employment statute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 120 and Art. 125 of the Higher Education Act
Art. 5 of the Labour Code
Art. 136 para. 1 of the Higher Education Act
art. 41 k.p
art. 5 k.p
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 39 k.p
art. 39814 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text