I PK 22/11
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; supervisory board's bonus for using company car violated remuneration cap law.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a former board member against a company's decision to grant a bonus for using a company car. The court found that the supervisory board's resolution violated the remuneration cap law by creating an unprovided benefit. Consequently, the court ruled that the board's action was void and ordered the plaintiff to pay the company's costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 5 ust. 1, 2 ustawy o wynagradzaniu osób kierujących niektórymi podmiotami; Art. 14 ust. 1 tej ustawy: The supervisory board's grant of a bonus for using a company car constitutes a violation of the remuneration cap law, rendering the resolution void and subjecting the board to dissolution.
Keywords
AI generated
remuneration cap law
supervisory board resolution
company car bonus
void administrative act
dissolution of board
remuneration regulation
legal violation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 5 ust. 1, 2 ustawy z dnia 3 marca 2000 r. o wynagradzaniu osób kierujących niektórymi podmiotami prawnymi
Art. 14 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 3 marca 2000 r. o wynagradzaniu osób kierujących niektórymi podmiotami prawnymi
art. 92 § 3 pkt 2 k.p
art. 92 § 1 k.p
art. 382 k.p.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 233 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII CK 471/04
Supreme Court quashes appeal ruling that quarterly bonuses to board members were invalid under salary cap law.
I CSK 261/10
Supreme Court dismisses appeal to declare contract void due to bankruptcy conversion of debt obligation.
III UK 120/05
Court ruled that paid legal work during sick leave constitutes employment, causing loss of sick pay entitlement.