Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II UK 378/10 AI generated

Social security obligation for bankruptcy trustees applies to holding office, not specific acts performed.

Case Number II UK 378/10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Ewa P. against the Social Insurance Fund regarding her social security obligations. The court determined that the statutory period for mandatory insurance coverage must be calculated based on the duration of holding the trustee's office rather than the specific tasks performed during the bankruptcy proceedings. Consequently, the lower court's ruling establishing liability for the entire tenure was upheld as legally correct.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 13 ust. 4 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych; Art. 14 § 5 rozporządzenia z 1934 r.; Art. 157 ust. 4 Prawa upadłościowego: The period of mandatory social security insurance for a bankruptcy trustee extends from the commencement of non-agricultural activity until its cessation, defined by the tenure of the office rather than the specific acts performed during the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy trustee social security obligation non-agricultural activity tenure of office bankruptcy proceedings insurance coverage period Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 13 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r. o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 14 § 5 rozporządzenia Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej z dnia 24 października 1934 r. - Prawo upadłościowe
Art. 157 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 18 lutego 2003 r. - Prawo upadłościowe i naprawcze
Art. 14a ustawy o swobodzie działalności gospodarczej
Art. 170 Prawa upadłościowego
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 39816 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I UK 293/07
Supreme Court quashes social security ruling, holding temporary business suspension does not equal cessation of activity.
I PK 107/10
Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal regarding dismissal for loss of trust and false statements.
II PK 138/10
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; employee's post-employment competition preparation did not constitute serious breach of duty.
II PK 129/10
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on overtime pay, ruling employer's denial of overtime work invalidates premium as flat-rate substitute.
I UK 257/07
Supreme Court ruled bankruptcy trustee not a business operator before Oct 2003, exempting them from mandatory health insurance.
III UK 133/06
Social security obligation for business operators persists during gaps unless proven by objective evidence.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text